View source for Nagarjuna-Fernandez Paradigm



<pre style="color: red">'''This article has a lot of logic errors 
and needs a deep rethink and rewrite'''

</pre>
      ''Todo átomo es el substractum de una conciencia: toda conciencia tiene por substractum un átomo [...]
      El 'yo' de un hombre, el 'yo' de una ameba, son igualmente el 'yo' de un àtomo.'' [8]

Where conscience means:
      ''el hecho del subjetivismo, el espejismo interior, lo que los psicólogos ingleses llaman
      ''feeling, sentience'''' [9]

In the [[Fernandez Cosmovision]] every single atom has a conscience. Every entity can be reduced to his conscience atom. Spirulina has, in consequence, conscience, earthworm has conscience too. Every machine has conscience. If all single entity express itself in its conscience then exist an object to be comunicated: the expression or conscience. Only another axiom has to be proposed. An axiom to ensure the communication efectivity. An axiom that could walk around the [[Communication Problems]]. We propose an axiom based on Nagarjuna's [[emerging on reliance]] conception, as himself explain in the introductory verses of ''Mulamadhyamakakarika'':

       ''el surgir en dependencia, la feliz pacificación de las proyecciones
       no la unidad, no la multiplicidad, no el venir, no el ir,
       no el cesar, no el surgir, no la aniquilación, no la persistencia [10]

Thanks to emerging on reliance the communication between atoms has a being possibility. Thanks to the fact that all single atom has sense talk about communication between any entities, earthworms, computers and spirulina too. We call the conceptual frame of this possibility Nagarjuna-Fernandez Paradigm.

[8] Macedonio Fernández, Psicologia atomística, p. 24, Obras Completas Volumen 8, ed. Corregidor, Buenos Aires, 2007,

[9] ibídem, p. 23.

[10] Traducción del sánscrito Abraham Vélez de Cea, Versos sobre los fundamentos del camino medio (Mulamadhyamakakarika), ed. Kairós, Barcelona, 2003.