Spirulina, Earthworms and Computers: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
# Move main project goal to the true texts production about the spirulina, earthworms and computers relations investigation. | # Move main project goal to the true texts production about the spirulina, earthworms and computers relations investigation. | ||
Every approach has its owns lacks and advantages. The main advantage of the first approach is its independece from empirical investigation as a logic construction. But this is too its principal problem because without works that shows it we only have text pieces that shows its possibility in a very widespread way. | |||
====First | The second approach has the adventage that allows start with empirical tests based in existing research results about the topics involved. Its main problem is the resources needed for the tests and essays and the work needed for compile and process the available information about topics. | ||
The third approach has the clear advantage to start with production. It don't need to prove a hypothesis to publish results. It needs the other two approaches to have something to write about, but this is also a good point because it's the perfect partner of the other two investigation ways. | |||
As a conclusion all three approaches will be used simultaneously. | |||
====First approach results==== | |||
| Line 80: | Line 85: | ||
[9] ibídem, p. 23. | [9] ibídem, p. 23. | ||
[10] Traducción del | [10] Traducción del sánscrito Abraham Vélez de Cea, ''Versos sobre los fundamentos del camino medio (Mulamadhyamakakarika)'', ed. Kairós, Barcelona, 2003. | ||
Revision as of 20:11, 6 January 2016
Spirulina, Earthworms and Computers' a project about interspecific communication limits, that involves spirulina[1], earthworms and computers [2].
In Chris Griscom words:
La comunicación entre las especies es una esperanza y un sueño para casi todos los seres humanos.
¿Quien no siente que puede hablar con su gato, su perro o su caballo, y que ellos, a su vez, saben
exactamente lo que estamos pensando y sintiendo? ¿Cuántas veces tenemos el corazón agitado por la ira
o la depresión y nuestro animal doméstico parece percibir los mismos sentimientos, cuando te aproximas
para darnos su apoyo o distraernos? [3]
And the benefits of this kind of comunication are beyond our imagination:
La comunicación [...] con otros seres del reino animal puede tener unas consecuencias mucho más
profundas [...]: nos ofrece la posibilidad de adquirir el instinto de supervivencia, alcanzado por
otras especies que se han adaptado a la comunidad de la Tierra desde un tiempo inmemorial. [4]
Esta comunicación [...] es una vasta e intrincada trama de una conciencia que penetra los éteres
cósmicos permitiendo que fluyan a través de nuestras antenas perceptivas [5]
esta facultad [...] es realmente la matriz multidimensional del saber interconectivo y sincrónico,
que permite expandir desde la transferencia de pensamiento hasta los dúos de movimientos físicos simbólicos e
interconectados posibles dentro de la familia humana y de todos los seres sensibles [6]
¿Podría ser, de hecho, que el grandioso homo sapiens no sea otra cosa que un hermano menor de
aquellos mayores que, al parecer, no sólo nos aventajan en varios millones de años en la Tierra
sino que, como muchos [...] insisten, de otras partes del universo? [7]
Starting Point
Beyond the amazing advantages of interspecific communication, it isn't a easy thing prove its possibility. Three ways to start working has came to us:
- Define a paradigm where this kind of communication would be logically possible as a first milestone before starting empirical experimentation.
- Take the current scientist paradigm and try to prove the communication empirically.
- Move main project goal to the true texts production about the spirulina, earthworms and computers relations investigation.
Every approach has its owns lacks and advantages. The main advantage of the first approach is its independece from empirical investigation as a logic construction. But this is too its principal problem because without works that shows it we only have text pieces that shows its possibility in a very widespread way. The second approach has the adventage that allows start with empirical tests based in existing research results about the topics involved. Its main problem is the resources needed for the tests and essays and the work needed for compile and process the available information about topics. The third approach has the clear advantage to start with production. It don't need to prove a hypothesis to publish results. It needs the other two approaches to have something to write about, but this is also a good point because it's the perfect partner of the other two investigation ways. As a conclusion all three approaches will be used simultaneously.
First approach results
Conceptual Settings
'''This part has a lot of logic errors and needs a deep rethink and rewrite'''
Todo átomo es el substractum de una conciencia: toda conciencia tiene por substractum un átomo [...]
El 'yo' de un hombre, el 'yo' de una ameba, son igualmente el 'yo' de un àtomo. [8]
Where conscience means:
el hecho del subjetivismo, el espejismo interior, lo que los psicólogos ingleses llaman
feeling, sentience'' [9]
In the Fernandez Cosmovision every single atom has a conscience. Every entity can be reduced to his conscience atom. Spirulina has, in consequence, conscience, earthworm has conscience too. Every machine has conscience. If all single entity express itself in its conscience then exist an object to be comunicated: the expression or conscience. Only another axiom has to be proposed. An axiom to ensure the communication efectivity. An axiom that could walk around the Communication Problems. We propose an axiom based on Nagarjuna's emerging on reliance conception, as himself explain in the introductory verses of Mulamadhyamakakarika:
el surgir en dependencia, la feliz pacificación de las proyecciones
no la unidad, no la multiplicidad, no el venir, no el ir,
no el cesar, no el surgir, no la aniquilación, no la persistencia [10]
Thanks to emerging on reliance the communication between atoms has a being possibility. Thanks to the fact that all single atom has sense talk about communication between any entities, earthworms, computers and spirulina too. We call the conceptual frame of this possibility Nagarjuna-Fernandez Paradigm.
[1] More info about Spirulina on Cultivando,conviviendo
[2] More info about computers on this project on Hurdy
[3] Chis Griscom, prólogo a Delfines y telepatía de Timothy Wyllie, ed. Luciernaga, 1995, Barcelona, p. 13.
[4] ibídem, p. 14.
[5] ibídem, p. 14.
[6] ibídem, p. 12.
[7] ibídem, p. 15.
[8] Macedonio Fernández, Psicologia atomística, p. 24, Obras Completas Volumen 8, ed. Corregidor, Buenos Aires, 2007,
[9] ibídem, p. 23.
[10] Traducción del sánscrito Abraham Vélez de Cea, Versos sobre los fundamentos del camino medio (Mulamadhyamakakarika), ed. Kairós, Barcelona, 2003.
